OUR METHOD / SOURCES BEFORE CLAIMS

First Person Boxing Editorial Policy

Every useful claim needs a clear basis. This is how we label evidence, handle disagreements and decide what is ready to publish.

Start with the right game

Our subject is the Roblox experience First Person Boxing by Can You Box?, with place ID 132956556682909. A matching phrase in a headline does not establish that a source concerns this experience. We compare the game identity, developer, context and current version before using a source.

The official links page records the identity checks. Similar combat terminology, including spins or styles, is not proof that a source belongs to another game.

What each source can support

The initial release has source-reported codes and official-description game information. It does not claim that this site's publisher personally redeemed those codes or completed comparative gameplay testing.

How code status works

Reported active and Reported expired describe what a cited source says. Verified active and Verified expired require a conclusive direct test by this site. An “already used” message, a failed connection or an eligibility issue is inconclusive for global expiration.

Disputed means relevant evidence conflicts or an opposing claim cannot safely be ordered against a test. We show the disagreement and retain the evidence rather than treating the majority of sources as a vote. A newer observation of the same source replaces its older statement in the current calculation, while the historical statement remains recorded.

Needs recheck is a freshness warning. After 48 hours, old evidence deserves another look; the warning does not mean a code has expired. Reviewing a publication again cannot reset the time of a game test that never happened.

Your personal tracker has separate Not tried, Tried and Redeemed statuses. Changing one only edits your notebook; it does not update the public code page.

Dates mean different things

A source's publication date, our source-check time, a direct test time and the page's content update date are separate records. We do not replace them with today's date on every visit. When a source gives only a calendar date, we do not invent an exact time or time zone.

Static code snapshots identify when their display state was generated. The browser can update a freshness warning as time passes, but it cannot perform a new game verification.

Original work and AI assistance

We contribute the organization, source comparison, explanation, original guide graphics and browser-local Code Tracker. AI may assist research or drafting. It is not a source of game facts, and an AI-written sentence is not a substitute for an observed result.

We publish detailed controls, combinations, style comparisons and ranked rules only when the evidence supports the promised answer. Rankings must explain the setup, criteria and limits of a real comparison. Missing numbers remain unknown; they are not filled with zeros or estimates presented as facts.

Corrections and commercial separation

Send a correction with the page, exact claim and supporting evidence. We compare it with existing sources, update the affected page when justified, and explain material changes. We cannot promise that every incoming report will result in a change.

No advertising code or affiliate purchase links are included in this initial release. Any future commercial relationship will be disclosed where relevant. Payment would not make an unsupported code, mechanic or ranking true.

See who maintains the site, the privacy policy and the terms of use.